Procrastination Is Never A Stranger - 4483 Words

Procrastination was never a stranger and never will be stranger to human. It existed in the society for a very long time, and existed in many cultures and regions alike. The word procrastination comes from the Latin word pro and crastinus . pro means forward and carstinus means tomorrow. Together it means to delay and postpone a work that is supposed to be completed right away. Every human being procrastinate. Procrastination comes to a person naturally, it only becomes important when you begin to procrastinate deliberately. When you start looking for reasons and other issues just to procrastinate your work then it is a very bad habit and you will need to rectify it right away. Procrastination happens in every field and in†¦show more content†¦They are often linked to the habits such as poor concentration, lack of interest in studies, depression, anxiety and these situations also act as a catalyst in the process of procrastination. CHAPTER 1: HISTORY OF PROCRASTINATION The humans were the same as they were thousands of years ago as they are in present. They all have this unending and increasing tendency to put off the works and procrastinate their immediate commitments. The historical researchers and scientists has found that in the Jewish ethical teaching articles which was published in 200 C.E, showed many verses and lines that told people not to procrastinate and put off their commitments and other important works. Bible also tells and points out the people s tendency to put off important things. Jesus has said that the important duties and commitments must be fulfilled immediately. But the history has also taught us that the principle and the concept of procrastination varied with each and every culture. In the earlier days France was an aristocratic society and all the labours

Social Norms in Jane Austen´s Pride and Prejudice

Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is well noted for its ability to question social norms. Most importantly, Austen explores the institution of marriage, as it was in her time, a time where many married for security rather than love. Her characters Elizabeth and Charlotte are renowned even more for their outspoken nature and different views on marriage. Though both Elizabeth and Charlotte yearn for a happy marriage, Charlotte has a more pragmatic and mundane approach while Elizabeth is more romantic and daring with her actions. Through the romantic involvements of both Elizabeth and Charlotte, Austen shows that happiness in marriage is not entirely a matter of chance, but is instead contingent on an accurate evaluation of self and others†¦show more content†¦Charlotte certainly notices Mr. Collin’s ostentatious behavior but chooses to ignore it, â€Å" When Mr. Collins said any thing of which his wife might reasonably be ashamed, which was certainly not unseldom, [E lizabeth] involuntarily turned to Charlotte†¦ in general Charlotte wisely did not hear† (Austen 154). Charlotte does not even acknowledge her husband, talk of helping him improve himself. The narrator, a reliable source comments on Charlotte and Mr. Collin’s relationship: â€Å" When Mr. Collins could be forgotten, there was a great air of comfort throughout, and by Charlotte’s evident enjoyment of it, Elizabeth supposed he must be often forgotten† (Austen 155). Charlotte is content but not happy and yet so she is pleased with the life she has created for herself. Charlotte and her husband exist in different spheres as Charlotte clearly ensures that she has as little contact with Mr. Collins as possible. We see this in her set up of the parlor, otherwise â€Å" Mr. Collins would have undoubtedly been less in his own apartment as they sat in one equally†(Austen 164). Charlotte’s behavior with Mr. Collins is pre-meditated and well deliber ated; her union with Mr. Collins is one of avoidance than marriage. In contrast in Elizabeth’s relationship with Darcy, not only are Elizabeth and Darcy able to recognize each other’s vices, but ultimately their knowledge of these inadequacies makes them better people. AsShow MoreRelatedEssay on Jane Austin and Pride Prejudice1457 Words   |  6 PagesJane Austin is currently known today as one of the women who first developed the ideas related to feminism (Abrams). Jane’s work became prevalent in English literature during time of transition from neo-classicism to romanticism (Abrams). She was influenced by a number of other literary figures of her time, and by the society in which she lived. Her writing sometimes reflected earlier writers, whom she sometimes mocked because they always portrayed a perfect world in their writing and the world wasRead MoreAn Annotated Bibliography Of Jane Austen s Pride And Prejudice 1561 Words   |  7 PagesGoing Against the Societal Norm in Pride and Prejudice: An Annotated Bibliography Thesis: Throughout the text of Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen challenges gender and social norms in the Georgian Era through the development of Elizabeth Bennet as she interacts with characters in the novel. Greenfield, Susan C. THE ABSENT-MINDED HEROINE: OR, ELIZABETH BENNET HAS †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦A THOUGHT. Eighteenth - Century Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, 2006, pp. 337-350,419-420, †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Arts Humanities Database, †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.http://ncliveRead MorePride And Prejudice By Jane Austen1189 Words   |  5 PagesLiterature April 21, 2016 Jane Austen s use of Satire in Pride and Prejudice Set in Nineteenth-century England, Jane Austen s Pride and Prejudice is a satirical novel focused on the ideals of social class and marriage. Austen plays on social behavior to show a society in which a woman s character is of the ultimate importance. A lady is expected to behave in a specific way and breaking the set social norms can put her at risk of being ostracized. In the 1800 s there were very little financialRead MoreThe Woman Of A Tradesman Essay1537 Words   |  7 Pagesthe fact that Emma is unmistakably a flight from the usual and ordinary Austen s depiction of women, the other female characters in the novel bring to light the challenges confronting ladies without monetary autonomy. Miss Bates, Jane Fairfax, and Harriet Smith represent three conceivable situations for the women who do not have high social status and position like Emma. Miss Bates never wedded and is reliant on her mother s insignificant wage. With the passage of time, her neediness builds, asRead MorePri de And Prejudice By Jane Austen933 Words   |  4 PagesJane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice was first published in 1813(Gary vii) a time when women had â€Å"few legal and economic rights or even receiving little respect, women can be seen as oppressed victims of a patriarchal society, subordinate first to their fathers and, then, to their husbands who had, of course, been selected by their fathers† (Swords, 76-82). At first glance one might think that Pride and Prejudice reinforces sexist stereotypes, however upon further examination of Jane Austen and herRead MoreJane Austen s Pride And Prejudice1138 Words   |  5 PagesPride and Prejudice is a novel about the superficiality of marriage during the late 19th and early 20th century, which largely influenced the decisions made by individuals, based on connections and social rankings. The novel takes its characters through various changes influenced by their decision to or rather not to marry certain individuals. It beg ins not by a man desiring to marry for love, but by a mother who desires nothing more than to marry her daughters well. As the novel develops, Jane AustenRead MoreThe Theme of Society in Pride and Prejudice Essay976 Words   |  4 PagesOriginally written in the late 1700s, Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice satirically depicts the universal ideals in Old Regency England, primarily regarding social class. Austen follows the development of an outspoken middle-class British woman, Elizabeth Bennet, as she encounters and overcomes the many social barriers that separate her from her wealthy upper-class neighbors. Throughout the novel, Lizzie must confront society’s class-consciousness, particularly with her family’s growing relationshipRead MoreJane Austen s Pride And Prejudice1693 Words   |  7 Pagesthe understanding of social, historical and cultural contexts through the reflections of illicit and explicit similarities and differences in the values and attribut es presented. Jane Austen’s 1813 novel Pride and Prejudice and Fay Weldon’s 1993 epistolary text Letters to Alice, both challenge the worth of their time as contexts change, but values are upheld. Weldon’s reflection on Austen’s nineteenth century environment, conveys to responders how marriage, gender roles and social class continue toRead MoreMarriage By Jane Austen s Pride And Prejudice 1674 Words   |  7 PagesHowever, Jane Austen argued that people would marry strictly for money and stability, rather than true love. In Pride and Prejudice, she used Mrs. Bennet, Darcy, Mr. Bingley, and Jane as a way to introduce the topic of how society was during this era and the common misconceptions of stereotypes put on women. Women would marry these men to ensure that they would continue to have social and economic stability, and essentially have someone other than their parents to take care of them. Jane Austen displayedRead MoreJane Austen s Criticism And Ju dgment Of Socially Constructed Beliefs Of Women1199 Words   |  5 PagesBy developing unconventional female characters that defied social customs, Jane Austen utilized her literary pieces as a framework to critique misogynist beliefs formed by society. Living in a patriarchal society dominated by men and harsh gender roles in England, Jane Austen sought to transform cultural values. She used the ideology of marriage and her heroines’ refusal of courtship to effectively and strategically chastise sexist views on gender and marriage. Her development of defiant characters

Humanitarian Issue-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Write a reflection explaining how the common good is challenged or negated by this issue (see the Reading below) locally and globally. Answer: The world has faced severe humanitarian crisis since the end of the Second World War. It created drastic changes in the political, economic and social conditions in the four countries which included- Syria, Sudan, South Somalia and Yemen (Morgan, Bapat Kobayashi, 2014). In this regard, it is noteworthy to mention here that without effective collaboration and coordinated global efforts the prevailing conditions would exist in future and will bring mishaps to the inhabitants. In my point of view the principle of common good was greatly contradicted as a result of the ongoing conflict which is the current issue of concern to the nations. In this regard it is worth mentioning that the security and the well being of the inhabitants are in stake which largely negated the principles of common good. In this regard, my beliefs and ideas about the principles of common good have been emphasized in order to provide deeper meaning towards the attainment of common good. The lives of the individua ls are greatly influenced by the principles of justice which is deeply ingrained in social relationships (McGoldrick, 2014). In this regard, it is noteworthy to mention here that one can progress towards the attainment of common good through coordination, citizenship, collection action as well as active cooperation in public service (Cremers, 2017). However, at the end of the Second World War, great crisis were influenced by the inhabitants. The nations witnessed the death of over one million children due to disease and starvation which was as a result of the struggle for existence. According to my perspective, with the end of the Second World War, the economic and social conditions of these countries have undergone drastic changes and in order to improve their conditions there should have been coordinated efforts both locally and globally. The local civilians made efforts to improve the condition however without global assistance the social and economic conditions cannot be restored. Therefore, it can be rightly stated that the principle of common good has been challenged both locally and globally as the nations failed to provide active participation and cooperation in addressing the issues faced by the countries in distress during crisis. In order to address the challenges of common good related to support within groups and communities as a means of effective advocacy various important factors can be emphasized. In my perspective, it is important that the government agencies must encourage active participation of groups across geographical boundaries for the purpose of funding and developing community projects. It is necessary on the part of the government agencies to determine the areas that have been largely affected as a result of war. It is essential to provide effective advocacy in order to undermine their interests and well being. In this regard the fifth principle of CST can be applied which is the role of the Government and Subsidiary. According to this principle the motive of the state is to protect human dignity in order to achieve common good. However, the functions of the government are held by the principle of subsidiary. The second principle of CST which is attainment of Common Good and Community can be significantly applied in order to address such challenges. With the help of this principle the rights incorporated in relationship between human communities can be realized (Bane, 2014). In order to contribute to the betterment of the society and the community it is important to have love and feeling of togetherness for the neighbors (Sekerk, 2016). Such factors contribute to the attainment of common good. In order to address the challenges related to exposure to hazards, a different approach of advocacy can be involved. In this approach there can be an involvement of both social connectedness and a sense of moral efficacy. In this regard, the fourth and fifth principles of CST can be applied which are- Rights and Responsibilities and Role of the Government and Subsidiary. According to these principles of CST human dignity can be protected and healthy community can be attainted when responsibilities are shared among each other (McCann, 2014). Every individual possesses fundamental right to life and the basic necessities of shelter, food and proper healthcare (Hrynkow O'Hara, 2014). Therefore, in my perspective, it is necessary for the part of the government and subsidiary to participate in various political institutions in order to achieve goals towards the attainment of common good and human dignity. According to my point of view, in order to address the challenges effectively it is vital on the part of the government to develop and promote public policies. In this regard, it is noteworthy to mention here that since time immemorial, various policies were developed by the government which vastly affected community health. However, such policies were mainly formulated by both governmental and non-governmental bodies such as corporations and professional institutions. In my perspective, institution of policy involves a matter of advocacy. However, it is important that such policies equally address the susceptibility, liability and consequences arising as a result of conflict that has been creating unhealthy conditions for the population. In my perspective, there is a need to change policies which begins with the government initiative. In this regard the legislators as well as the appointed official should take active participation in order to improve health and development outcomes of the inhabitants suffered as a result of war and crisis. In recent era the process of changing policies are often employed with various difficulties. However, with the implementation of new policies, health and economic conditions in the affected areas can be improved effectively in the long run. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that the eighth and tenth principles of the CST can be applied in this regard which involves- Promotion of Peace and Disarmament and Global Solidarity and Development. Since time immemorial, Catholic teaching has promoted the significance of peace by stating that peace can not only be attained in the absence of war but also through mutual appreciation and determination among the nations (Hill Capella, 2014 ). References: Bane, M. J. (2014). Catholic social teachings, American politics and inequality.Journal of Catholic Social Thought,11(2), 391-404. Cremers, M. (2017). What corporate governance can learn from catholic social teaching.Journal of Business Ethics,145(4), 711-724. Hill, R. P., Capella, M. L. (2014). Impoverished consumers, Catholic social teaching, and distributive justice.Journal of Business Research,67(2), 32-41. Hrynkow, C., O'Hara, D. P. (2014). Catholic social teaching and climate justice from a peace studies perspective: current practice, tensions, and promise.New Theology Review,26(2), 23-32. McCann, D. P. (2014). Who is responsible for the common good? Catholic social teaching and the praxis of subsidiarity. InThe common good: Chinese and American perspectives(pp. 261-289). Springer, Dordrecht. McGoldrick, T. A. (2014). Episcopal conferences worldwide and catholic social thought, in theory and praxis: an update.Theological Studies,75(2), 376-403. Morgan, T. C., Bapat, N., Kobayashi, Y. (2014). Threat and imposition of economic sanctions 19452005: Updating the TIES dataset.Conflict Management and Peace Science,31(5), 541-558. Sekerk, M. (2016). Towards a worldwide (deliberative) democracy? Catholic social teaching and the idea of global governance.Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica,46(3), 291-311.