Humanitarian Issue-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Write a reflection explaining how the common good is challenged or negated by this issue (see the Reading below) locally and globally. Answer: The world has faced severe humanitarian crisis since the end of the Second World War. It created drastic changes in the political, economic and social conditions in the four countries which included- Syria, Sudan, South Somalia and Yemen (Morgan, Bapat Kobayashi, 2014). In this regard, it is noteworthy to mention here that without effective collaboration and coordinated global efforts the prevailing conditions would exist in future and will bring mishaps to the inhabitants. In my point of view the principle of common good was greatly contradicted as a result of the ongoing conflict which is the current issue of concern to the nations. In this regard it is worth mentioning that the security and the well being of the inhabitants are in stake which largely negated the principles of common good. In this regard, my beliefs and ideas about the principles of common good have been emphasized in order to provide deeper meaning towards the attainment of common good. The lives of the individua ls are greatly influenced by the principles of justice which is deeply ingrained in social relationships (McGoldrick, 2014). In this regard, it is noteworthy to mention here that one can progress towards the attainment of common good through coordination, citizenship, collection action as well as active cooperation in public service (Cremers, 2017). However, at the end of the Second World War, great crisis were influenced by the inhabitants. The nations witnessed the death of over one million children due to disease and starvation which was as a result of the struggle for existence. According to my perspective, with the end of the Second World War, the economic and social conditions of these countries have undergone drastic changes and in order to improve their conditions there should have been coordinated efforts both locally and globally. The local civilians made efforts to improve the condition however without global assistance the social and economic conditions cannot be restored. Therefore, it can be rightly stated that the principle of common good has been challenged both locally and globally as the nations failed to provide active participation and cooperation in addressing the issues faced by the countries in distress during crisis. In order to address the challenges of common good related to support within groups and communities as a means of effective advocacy various important factors can be emphasized. In my perspective, it is important that the government agencies must encourage active participation of groups across geographical boundaries for the purpose of funding and developing community projects. It is necessary on the part of the government agencies to determine the areas that have been largely affected as a result of war. It is essential to provide effective advocacy in order to undermine their interests and well being. In this regard the fifth principle of CST can be applied which is the role of the Government and Subsidiary. According to this principle the motive of the state is to protect human dignity in order to achieve common good. However, the functions of the government are held by the principle of subsidiary. The second principle of CST which is attainment of Common Good and Community can be significantly applied in order to address such challenges. With the help of this principle the rights incorporated in relationship between human communities can be realized (Bane, 2014). In order to contribute to the betterment of the society and the community it is important to have love and feeling of togetherness for the neighbors (Sekerk, 2016). Such factors contribute to the attainment of common good. In order to address the challenges related to exposure to hazards, a different approach of advocacy can be involved. In this approach there can be an involvement of both social connectedness and a sense of moral efficacy. In this regard, the fourth and fifth principles of CST can be applied which are- Rights and Responsibilities and Role of the Government and Subsidiary. According to these principles of CST human dignity can be protected and healthy community can be attainted when responsibilities are shared among each other (McCann, 2014). Every individual possesses fundamental right to life and the basic necessities of shelter, food and proper healthcare (Hrynkow O'Hara, 2014). Therefore, in my perspective, it is necessary for the part of the government and subsidiary to participate in various political institutions in order to achieve goals towards the attainment of common good and human dignity. According to my point of view, in order to address the challenges effectively it is vital on the part of the government to develop and promote public policies. In this regard, it is noteworthy to mention here that since time immemorial, various policies were developed by the government which vastly affected community health. However, such policies were mainly formulated by both governmental and non-governmental bodies such as corporations and professional institutions. In my perspective, institution of policy involves a matter of advocacy. However, it is important that such policies equally address the susceptibility, liability and consequences arising as a result of conflict that has been creating unhealthy conditions for the population. In my perspective, there is a need to change policies which begins with the government initiative. In this regard the legislators as well as the appointed official should take active participation in order to improve health and development outcomes of the inhabitants suffered as a result of war and crisis. In recent era the process of changing policies are often employed with various difficulties. However, with the implementation of new policies, health and economic conditions in the affected areas can be improved effectively in the long run. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that the eighth and tenth principles of the CST can be applied in this regard which involves- Promotion of Peace and Disarmament and Global Solidarity and Development. Since time immemorial, Catholic teaching has promoted the significance of peace by stating that peace can not only be attained in the absence of war but also through mutual appreciation and determination among the nations (Hill Capella, 2014 ). References: Bane, M. J. (2014). Catholic social teachings, American politics and inequality.Journal of Catholic Social Thought,11(2), 391-404. Cremers, M. (2017). What corporate governance can learn from catholic social teaching.Journal of Business Ethics,145(4), 711-724. Hill, R. P., Capella, M. L. (2014). Impoverished consumers, Catholic social teaching, and distributive justice.Journal of Business Research,67(2), 32-41. Hrynkow, C., O'Hara, D. P. (2014). Catholic social teaching and climate justice from a peace studies perspective: current practice, tensions, and promise.New Theology Review,26(2), 23-32. McCann, D. P. (2014). Who is responsible for the common good? Catholic social teaching and the praxis of subsidiarity. InThe common good: Chinese and American perspectives(pp. 261-289). Springer, Dordrecht. McGoldrick, T. A. (2014). Episcopal conferences worldwide and catholic social thought, in theory and praxis: an update.Theological Studies,75(2), 376-403. Morgan, T. C., Bapat, N., Kobayashi, Y. (2014). Threat and imposition of economic sanctions 19452005: Updating the TIES dataset.Conflict Management and Peace Science,31(5), 541-558. Sekerk, M. (2016). Towards a worldwide (deliberative) democracy? Catholic social teaching and the idea of global governance.Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica,46(3), 291-311.